Double J. Farmlands v. Paradise Baptist Church


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-CA-01537-SCT
Linked Case(s): 2007-CA-01537-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 12-04-2008
Opinion Author: Dickinson, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Real property - Adverse possession
Judge(s) Concurring: Smith, C.J., Waller and Diaz, P.JJ., Carlson and Randolph, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Lamar, J.
Dissenting Author : Easley, J., without separate written opinion.
Concurs in Result Only: Graves, J.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - REAL PROPERTY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 09-05-2007
Appealed from: TATE COUNTY CHANCERY COURT
Judge: Percy L. Lynchard, Jr.
Disposition: The Chancery Court denied Double J. Farrmlands' adverse possession claim.
Case Number: 06-02-0045PL

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Double J. Farmlands




Parker H. Still; Rebecca S. Thompson



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: Paradise Baptist Church, Et al and Betty Downs Tyler Mildred J. Lesure  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Real property - Adverse possession

    Summary of the Facts: In 1961, Mrs. Omega Thomas conveyed fifty acres of property to Harvey Tyler and his wife, Betty Tyler. In 2005, after Mr. Tyler’s death, Mrs. Tyler conveyed by warranty deed the 50-Acre Tract to the Paradise Baptist Church. In 1995, Joyce White conveyed a large tract of property to Double J Farmlands. A portion of the Double J Property abutted the 50-Acre Tract. Although the deed conveying the Double J Property specifically excluded the 50-Acre Tract, a fence around the Double J Property included the part of the 50-Acre Tract which is in dispute, that is, a 6.5-Acre Tract. In 2005, as part of its acquisition of the 50-Acre Tract from Mrs. Tyler, Paradise ordered a survey. The survey revealed that six-and-a-half acres of its property was inside Double J’s fence. Double J took no action against Paradise or the surveyor until February 2006, when it filed suit against Paradise to quiet and confirm title to the 6.5-Acre Tract by adverse possession. Paradise answered and filed a third-party complaint against Betty Tyler for breach of the Warranty Deed. Double J moved for summary judgment which the court denied. At the conclusion of Double J’s case-in-chief, Paradise moved for dismissal which the court granted, finding that the property deeded to Double J specifically excluded the 50-Acre Tract of land owned by the Tylers which, in turn, included the 6.5-Acre Tract. Double J appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: To acquire property by adverse possession, a claimant must show that its possession of the property was open, notorious, and visible; hostile; under claim of ownership; exclusive; peaceful; and continuous and uninterrupted for a period of ten years. The chancellor found that Double J failed to show that its occupation of the 6.5-Acre Tract was hostile. The mere presence of a fence, without more, has never been sufficient to sustain a claim of adverse possession. Double J must present some proof that its occupation of the record owner’s property was hostile, and that the record owner – aware of the adverse possessor’s hostile occupation – took no action to prevent adverse possession. Here, the true owner, i.e., the Tylers, built a fence on their property and, as a result, fenced the 6.5-Acre Tract out of their property. It was not Double J who fenced the disputed property in. In fact, Double J took no action which was adverse to the Tylers’ interest in the 6.5-Acre Tract. The record also includes proof that the Tylers paid taxes on the 6.5-Acre Tract. Moreover, Double J knew the surveyors were on the 6.5-Acre Tract conducting the survey, but took no action to eject them. Thus, the chancellor did not commit manifest error in ruling that Double J had failed to prove one of the necessary elements of its claim of adverse possession.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court