Bratcher v. Surrette


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-CA-00201-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 06-24-2003
Opinion Author: Griffis, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Modification of visitation
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers and Chandler, JJ.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - CUSTODY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-22-2002
Appealed from: Panola County Chancery Court
Judge: Percy L. Lynchard, Jr.
Disposition: DENIAL OF CUSTODIAL PARENT'S PETITION TO MODIFY VISITATION
Case Number: B-99-11-410(L)

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Sherry Rena (Cosby) Surrette Bratcher




JOHN THOMAS LAMAR



 

Appellee: Kevin Lorenzo Surrette GERALD W. CHATHAM  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Modification of visitation

Summary of the Facts: Sherry argues that compelling evidence was presented during trial that showed the child was placed in harm's way by returning him to unsupervised visitation with his father and that it was improper for the chancellor to question the credibility of the child. Where the terms of visitation are at issue, all that need be shown is that there is a prior decree providing for reasonable visitation rights which isn't working and that it is in the best interest of the children as fostering a positive and harmonious relationship between them and their divorced parents to have custody provisions made specific. The determination of whether the child was sexually abused by his father is a question of fact to be decided by the chancellor. Here, the court’s finding that substantial evidence showed the child's problems with constipation and painful bowel movements could have caused his injury and the evidence submitted by Sherry was insufficient to rebut this possibility is not an abuse of discretion.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Sherry Bratcher petitioned the court for modification of Kevin Surrette's visitation with the couple's minor child, asserting that Kevin had sexually molested their child. The chancellor refused to restrict visitation, and Sherry appeals.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court