Collins v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-KA-00459-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 10-28-2003
Opinion Author: McMillin, C.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Rape & Armed robbery - Sufficiency of evidence - Waiver of claim of error
Judge(s) Concurring: King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers, Chandler and Griffis, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 02-21-2002
Appealed from: Lowndes County Circuit Court
Judge: John M. Montgomery
Disposition: RAPE AND ARMED ROBBERY HABITUAL OFFENDER - SENTENCED TO SERVE A TERM OF LIFE IN THE MDOC FOR EACH COUNT, EACH TERM TO BE SERVED CONSECUTIVELY, SUCH SENTENCE SHALL NOT BE REDUCED NOR SUSPENDED NOR SHALL SAID DEFENDANT BE ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE OR PROBATION.
District Attorney: Forrest Allgood
Case Number: 2000-0687-CR1

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Larry Collins




CARRIE A. JOURDAN



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Rape & Armed robbery - Sufficiency of evidence - Waiver of claim of error

Summary of the Facts: Larry Collins was convicted of the crimes of rape and armed robbery. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Collins argues that the State’s evidence implicating him in the crimes was insufficient as a matter of law. If a defendant tests the sufficiency of the State’s evidence by way of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal after the prosecution has rested and that motion is unsuccessful, the defendant is deemed to have waived a claim of error based on that denial if he proceeds to put on evidence in defense and then fails to renew the motion at the close of all the evidence. At the conclusion of the State’s proof, Collins moved for a directed verdict of acquittal. He failed to renew the motion or to present the issue to the court in a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Therefore, his issue is barred on appeal.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court