Brown v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-KA-00448-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 11-18-2003
Opinion Author: Irving, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Armed robbery - Sufficiency of evidence - Deadly weapon
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Myers, Chandler and Griffis, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 02-08-2002
Appealed from: Washington County Circuit Court
Judge: W. Ashley Hines
Disposition: ARMED ROBBERY - SENTENCED TO SERVE A TERM OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MDOC. DEFENDANT IS FURTHER ORDERED TO PAY COURT COST OF $263.
Case Number: 2001-357

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Gregory Adams Brown a/k/a Gregory A. Brown a/k/a Gregory Brown




CAROL L. WHITE-RICHARD



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JEAN SMITH VAUGHAN  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Armed robbery - Sufficiency of evidence - Deadly weapon

Summary of the Facts: Gregory Brown was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Brown argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the essential elements of the crime, because the victim’s testimony is insufficient to support a finding that a deadly weapon was used since she did not get a good look at the object used and could not identify any particular object until after he was arrested. The victim testified that she felt a sharp object at her side when she was instructed by Brown to open the cash register and that although she was not able to get a good look at the object during the course of the robbery, she did look at the object in Brown’s hand which she later described to police as a tool-like object. Because she was able to see the sharp instrument before the robbery was completed, the exhibition element of the crime was sufficiently proven.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court