Murray v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-KM-01222-SCT
Linked Case(s): 2002-KM-01222-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 03-04-2004
Opinion Author: Graves, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: DUI first offense - Timeliness of appeal - Section 99-35-1 - URCCC 12.02A
Judge(s) Concurring: Pittman, C.J., Smith and Waller, P.JJ., Cobb, Easley, Carlson and Dickinson, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Diaz, J.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - MISDEMEANOR

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 06-24-2002
Appealed from: Copiah County Circuit Court
Judge: Lamar Pickard
Disposition: Appellant was convicted of DUI and switched tag.
District Attorney: Alexander C. Martin
Case Number: 2002-0060CR

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Christopher Murray




SORIE S. TARAWALLY



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. GLENN WATTS  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: DUI first offense - Timeliness of appeal - Section 99-35-1 - URCCC 12.02A

Summary of the Facts: Christopher Murray was convicted and sentenced in the Copiah County Justice Court for driving under the influence, first offense, and switched tag. Murray filed a notice of appeal to circuit court. The court dismissed the appeal as untimely, and Murray appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Murray argues that the court erred in dismissing his appeal, because his appeal was timely. While section 99-35-1 allows a person adjudged guilty of a criminal offense by a justice court to appeal to circuit court within forty days of such judgment of conviction, under URCCC 12.02A, Murray had thirty days to file a notice of appeal in the circuit court having jurisdiction. Where there is conflict between a statute and a procedural rule created by the Supreme Court, the rule controls and the statute is void. Therefore, the circuit court did not err in dismissing Murray’s appeal as untimely under URCCC 12.02A.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court