Shields v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-CP-01994-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 01-17-2012
Opinion Author: Russell, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence - Habitual offender status - Section 99-19-81
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Irving and Griffis, P.JJ., Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Carlton and Maxwell, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Fair, J.
Procedural History: PCR
Nature of the Case: PCR

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 10-14-2010
Appealed from: Madison County Circuit Court
Judge: Samac Richardson
Disposition: MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED
Case Number: 2010-0353-R

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Clonelle Shields a/k/a Clonelle Demarcus Shields




PRO SE



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL: JOHN R. HENRY JR.  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence - Habitual offender status - Section 99-19-81

Summary of the Facts: Clonelle Shields pled guilty to business burglary (Count I); business burglary (Count II); simple assault of a law-enforcement officer (Count I); simple assault of a law-enforcement officer (Count II); and possession of more than .1 gram but less than 2 grams of cocaine (Count III). Shields was sentenced as a habitual offender. Shields filed a post-conviction relief motion seeking to have his enhanced sentence as a habitual offender vacated on the basis that the 1997 aggravated-assault conviction listed within the State’s information was reversed by the Supreme Court and that case was remanded for resentencing under the simple-assault statute. The trial court denied the motion, and Shields appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Shields argues that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual offender. If a defendant is a repeat offender falling within the provisions of section 99-19-81, the trial judge has no alternative but to sentence him under the statute. In addition to his 1997 aggravated-assault conviction, Shields had two other felony convictions that were properly used to sentence Shields as a habitual offender. Therefore, Shields was required to be sentenced as a habitual offender.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court