Expose v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-KA-01256-COA
Linked Case(s): 2010-KA-01256-COA ; 2010-CT-01256-SCT ; 2010-CT-01256-SCT

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 11-15-2011
Opinion Author: Lee, C.J.
Holding: Reversed and remanded

Additional Case Information: Topic: Forcible sexual intercourse - Defense theory instruction - Exculpatory evidence
Judge(s) Concurring: Irving and Griffis, P.JJ., Myers, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Maxwell and Russell, JJ.
Dissenting Author : Carlton, J.
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 07-21-2010
Appealed from: Stone County Circuit Court
Judge: John C. Gargiulo
Disposition: CONVICTED OF FORCIBLE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AND SENTENCED TO THIRTY-FIVE YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: B6601-2009-93

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Anthony Mercie Expose




W. DANIEL HINCHCLIFF



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: W. GLENN WATTS  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Forcible sexual intercourse - Defense theory instruction - Exculpatory evidence

Summary of the Facts: Anthony Expose was convicted of forcible sexual intercourse. Expose was sentenced to thirty-five years and to register as a sex offender upon release from custody. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Defense theory instruction Expose argues that the trial court erred by denying two of his jury instructions that instructed the jury on his theory of the case, namely that the sex with the victim was consensual. A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed as to his theory of the case so long as the defense is one recognized in the law and there is some evidence in the record to support the defense. Consent is a defense to a charge of rape. There was testimony from Expose that he had consensual sex with the victim. Thus, Expose was entitled to a jury instruction that embodied his theory of the defense. Issue 2: Exculpatory evidence Expose argues that he discovered potential exculpatory evidence the day after trial relating to a prior domestic-violence conviction of the victim’s boyfriend, who had committed domestic violence against the victim in January 2010 and was convicted shortly thereafter. That crime occurred well after the crime involved in this case. Since this case is being reversed and remanded for a new trial, the Court will not determine whether the trial court was in error for failing to grant a new trial.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court