Alexander v. Musgrove


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-CA-00890-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 10-11-2011
Opinion Author: Irving, P.J.
Holding: Reversed and remanded

Additional Case Information: Topic: Real property - Set aside tax deed
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Myers, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Carlton, Maxwell and Russell, JJ.
Judge(s) Concurring Separately: Griffis, P.J., concurs in result only without separate written opinion
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - REAL PROPERTY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 04-27-2010
Appealed from: Lawrence County Chancery Court
Judge: J. Larry Buffington
Disposition: SET ASIDE TAX-SALE DEED
Case Number: 14,871

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: James Alexander




JASON T. BARRETT



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: Patsy Phillips Musgrove a/k/a Patsy Joan Vanderford MALCOLM T. ROGERS  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Real property - Set aside tax deed

    Summary of the Facts: James Alexander purchased property at two different tax sales. The property’s previous owner, Patsy Musgrove, filed suit seeking to cancel the tax deeds. The chancery court issued an order setting aside a tax deed connected with the property. Alexander appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: The final judgment did not explicitly address the second tax sale. The chancery court’s statement—that “The [c]ourt further finds that the tax deed issued as a result of that void tax sale is likewise set aside”— could refer to either tax sale. Furthermore, the judgment did not address the proceeds of the lumber sale, even though the previous summary-judgment order stated that the sale would be addressed in the chancery court’s final judgment. Also, it is impossible to discern from the chancery court’s judgment exactly what monies were to be remitted to Alexander for his payment of the taxes. Thus, the case is remanded.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court