Mid-South Retina, LLC v. Conner


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-IA-00190-SCT
Linked Case(s): 2010-M-00190-SCT ; 2010-IA-00190-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 09-08-2011
Opinion Author: Carlson, P.J.
Holding: Reversed and Rendered

Additional Case Information: Topic: Medical negligence - Causation - Expert testimony by nurse - Retroactive effect of opinion
Judge(s) Concurring: Waller, C.J., Dickinson, P.J., Randolph, Lamar, Chandler and Pierce, JJ.
Dissenting Author : Kitchens, J.
Dissent Joined By : King, J.
Procedural History: Interlocutory Appeal
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-11-2010
Appealed from: Coahoma County County Court
Judge: Thomas Allen
Disposition: Originally granted summary judgment in favor of Mid-South, finding that Conner had failed to establish the necessary element of causation. The trial court then reversed its judgment upon reconsideration and denied Mid-South’s motion for summary judgment.
Case Number: 14-CO-04-116

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Mid-South Retina, LLC




SHELBY KIRK MILAM JOSIAH DENNIS COLEMAN



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: Bernice Conner DANIEL M. CZAMANSKE, JR. JOSEPH HARLAND WEBSTER  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Medical negligence - Causation - Expert testimony by nurse - Retroactive effect of opinion

    Summary of the Facts: Bernice Conner filed a medical-negligence suit against Mid-South Retina, LLC. The court originally granted summary judgment in favor of Mid-South, finding that Conner had failed to establish the necessary element of causation. The trial court then reversed its judgment upon reconsideration and denied Mid-South’s motion for summary judgment. Mid-South filed a petition for interlocutory appeal which was granted.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: In medical-negligence cases, expert testimony is generally required to survive summary judgment. Mid-South argues that a registered nurse designated by Conner as her expert witness cannot offer an opinion on medical causation, and thus, Conner has failed to establish the necessary element of causation. Conner argues that the issue of whether the nurse may render an expert opinion on causation was not before the trial court and therefore is not properly before the Court on interlocutory appeal. In a prior case, the Supreme Court held that nurses cannot render expert opinions on medical causation. However, the parties in today’s case were without the benefit of that case during the pretrial phase and the Court’s holding in that case was not brought before the trial judge as part of the parties’ pretrial arguments. The Court’s decisions are presumed to have retroactive effect unless otherwise specified. In the prior case, the Court did not state that its ruling was prospective. Thus it is presumably retroactive. Conner’s only designated expert, a nurse, may not render an expert opinion on medical causation.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court