Triste v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-CP-00864-COA
Linked Case(s): 2010-CP-00864-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 07-26-2011
Opinion Author: Maxwell, J.
Holding: Affirmed.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence - Section 47-7-34 - Section 97-17-23(1)
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Irving and Griffis, P.JJ., Myers, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Carlton and Russell, JJ.
Nature of the Case: PCR

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 03-09-2010
Appealed from: Itawamba County Circuit Court
Judge: James L. Roberts
Disposition: MOTION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED
Case Number: 2010-012-RI

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Joseph R. Triste




PRO SE



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: JOHN R. HENRY JR., SCOTT STUART  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence - Section 47-7-34 - Section 97-17-23(1)

    Summary of the Facts: Joseph Triste pled guilty to burglary and kidnapping. On Count I, the circuit court sentenced Triste to twenty-five years, with seventeen years suspended, followed by five years of post-release supervision. As a condition of the suspended sentence, Triste was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine. On Count II, the circuit court sentenced Triste to thirty years, all suspended. Triste filed a motion for post-conviction relief which was denied. He appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Triste argues that the sentence for burglary is illegal because it exceeded the twenty-five-year maximum sentence for burglary, given his five years of post-release supervision. Section 47-7-34 provides that the total number of years of incarceration plus the total number of years of post-release supervision shall not exceed the maximum sentence authorized to be imposed by law for the felony committed. Triste was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He was ordered to serve eight years, and the circuit judge suspended seventeen years. Triste’s five-year period of post-release supervision, when added to the eight-year period of incarceration, is thirteen years. This is well within the twenty-five-year maximum sentence authorized by section 97-17-23(1). Therefore, Triste’s sentence is lawful. Triste also argues the circuit court lacked authority to order that he pay a $1,000 fine because the burglary statute does not provide for fines. But he disregards the fact that the circuit court had authority to order the $1,000 fine under section 99-19-32(1). Because Triste’s burglary conviction was punishable by more than one year of imprisonment and was not otherwise subject to a fine, the circuit judge had authority to fine him up to $10,000.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court