Johnson v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-KA-00378-COA
Linked Case(s): 2010-KA-00378-COA ; 2010-CT-00378-SCT

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 07-19-2011
Opinion Author: Ishee, J.
Holding: AFFIRMED

Additional Case Information: Topic: Manslaughter - Re-sentencing order
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Irving and Griffis, P.JJ., Myers, Barnes, Roberts, Carlton and Maxwell, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Russell, J.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-14-2010
Appealed from: Jackson County Circuit Court
Judge: Robert P. Krebs
Disposition: RE-SENTENCED FOR MANSLAUGHTER TO TWENTY YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
District Attorney: Anthony N. Lawrence, III
Case Number: 2004-10,118(1)

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: John Johnson a/k/a John Edward Johnson




GEORGE S. SHADDOCK



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Manslaughter - Re-sentencing order

Summary of the Facts: John Johnson was convicted of murder and sentenced to life. He appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed the murder conviction and remanded for resentencing on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter. The circuit court then resentenced Johnson for manslaughter to twenty years. Johnson appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Johnson argues that the sentencing order is invalid because the order omitted the crime for which he was convicted. Johnson is incorrect in this regard. The re-sentencing order clearly states the following information in the heading: the case number, Johnson’s name, and “MANSLAUGHTER (AS PER COURT OF APPEAL’S [sic] RULING).” Johnson again argues that he acted in self-defense when he shot the victim and that the jury overlooked evidence to support his theory of self-defense. However, Johnson is procedurally barred from raising the same issues that have already been decided on direct appeal.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court