Traylor v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2010-CP-01139-COA
Linked Case(s): 2010-CP-01139-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 06-28-2011
Opinion Author: Irving, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Double jeopardy - Ineffective assistance of counsel
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Griffis, P.J., Myers, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Carlton, Maxwell and Russell, JJ.
Procedural History: PCR
Nature of the Case: PCR

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 06-07-2010
Appealed from: Lee County Circuit Court
Judge: James L. Roberts
Case Number: CV10-071(R)(L)

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Jimmy Traylor




PRO SE



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: LADONNA C. HOLLAND  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Post-conviction relief - Double jeopardy - Ineffective assistance of counsel

Summary of the Facts: Jimmy Traylor pled guilty to culpable-negligence manslaughter and felonious child abuse. He was sentenced to twenty years for the culpable-negligence-manslaughter charge and forty years for the felonious-child-abuse charge, with five years of post-release supervision. Traylor filed a motion for post-conviction relief which was denied. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Double jeopardy Traylor argues that his plea upon criminal information to felonious child abuse constitutes double jeopardy. Traylor pled guilty to culpable-negligence manslaughter and felonious child abuse following the death of his three-month-old son. The charges stemmed from two separate and distinct criminal acts–starving his son to death and breaking his son’s femur. Therefore, a double-jeopardy analysis is unnecessary. Double jeopardy protects criminal defendants from being exposed to more than one prosecution for the same offense. It does not protect a defendant against different prosecutions for different offenses. Issue 2: Ineffective assistance of counsel Traylor argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney allowed him to plead guilty to two charges stemming from the same crime. Traylor was not subjected to double jeopardy; therefore, his argument is without merit.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court