Osborne v. Neblett


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2009-CP-01312-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 06-07-2011
Opinion Author: Irving, P.J.
Holding: Reversed and rendered.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Real property - Foreclosure sale - Section 89-1-55 - Publication requirements - Waiver
Judge(s) Concurring: Lee, C.J., Barnes, Ishee and Maxwell, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Russell, J.
Dissenting Author : Griffis, P.J. With Separate Written Opinion
Dissent Joined By : Myers, Roberts, and Carlton, JJ.
Procedural History: Dismissal
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - REAL PROPERTY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 02-12-2009
Appealed from: Bolivar County Chancery Court
Judge: William Willard
Disposition: Dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint to Stop Foreclosure, Confirmed Foreclosure Title in Defendant, and Ordered Plaintiff to Vacate Within Sixty Days
Case Number: 2008-0394

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Perry Osborne




PRO SE



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: G. Rives Neblett, Real Estate Investor/Developer and Glenn H. Williams, Attorney and Trustee for G.Rives Neblett GLENN H. WILLIAMS  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Real property - Foreclosure sale - Section 89-1-55 - Publication requirements - Waiver

    Summary of the Facts: G. Rives Neblett foreclosed a deed of trust that had been granted to him by Perry Osborne. On the day of the foreclosure sale, Osborne unsuccessfully sought injunctive relief in chancery court. He later sought, via an M.R.C.P. 60(b) motion, reconsideration of the court’s denial of injunctive relief. This effort was likewise unsuccessful. Osborne appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Osborne argues that the chancery court erred when it validated the foreclosure sale, which did not comply with the publication requirements found in section 89-1-55. Section 89-1-55 clearly requires three weeks between the first publication and the foreclosure sale. Furthermore, failure to comply with the statute’s publication requirements renders a foreclosure sale void. In this case, Neblett sold Osborne’s land on December 4, 2008, when only sixteen days had passed since the first publication. The sale could not have been legally held until December 9, 2008, twenty-one days after the initial publication. Because the sale did not comply with the publication requirements of section 89-1-55, the sale is void. Neblett argues that Osborne waived the notice issue when he failed to raise it in his initial complaint or at the hearing. However, as the statute clearly states, foreclosure sales that do not comply with section 89-1-55 are void, and Osborne’s failure to raise the issue is irrelevant because the sale is a nullity and unenforceable under the law. Furthermore, the publication requirements of section 89-1-55 may not be waived by the parties. As such, the chancery court erred in ratifying the foreclosure sale.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court