In Re Cook, et al. v. Cook
| Docket Number: | 2004-CA-02303-COA | |
| Court of Appeals: |
Opinion Link Opinion Date: 09-05-2006 Opinion Author: Southwick, J. Holding: Affirmed |
|
| Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Wills & estates - Mental capacity - Undue influence Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Irving, Chandler, Griffis, Barnes, Ishee and Roberts, JJ. Procedural History: Bench Trial Nature of the Case: CIVIL - WILLS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES |
|
| Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 10-18-2004 Appealed from: Warren County Chancery Court Judge: Jane R. Weathersby Disposition: UPHELD CONVEYANCES FROM MOTHER TO SON, JOHN COOK, SR. Case Number: 2003-077 PR |
|
| Consolidated: Consolidated with 2005-CA-00395-COA In Re: Conservatorship of Virginia B. Cook: Camille C. Robinson v. John B. Cook, Jr., as the Personal Representative of John B. Cook, Sr., Deceased, and Virginia B. Cook; Warren Chancery Court; LC Case #: 2003-077PR; Ruling Date: 12/14/2004; Ruling Judge: Jane Weathersby | ||
| Party Name: | Attorney Name: | |||
| Appellant: | In Re: Conservatorship of Virginia B. Cook: Camille C. Robinson |
ROBERT LEWIS SPELL |
||
| Appellee: | John B. Cook, Jr., as the Personal Representative of John B. Cook, Sr., Deceased, and Virginia B. Cook | MARK W. PREWITT |
|
|
Synopsis provided by:  If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
|
| Topic: | Wills & estates - Mental capacity - Undue influence |
| Summary of the Facts: | In the early 1960’s, Virginia Cook inherited $50,000 and 360 acres of land from her father. At the time of the judgment in this case, her assets amounted to about $342,000. Virginia Cook has three children – John, Camille, and Theodore. Both cash and real property were transferred from Virginia to John. John and Camille agreed that a conservator should be appointed for their mother. Each sought that position. John Cook initially was named, and after his death, Camille Robinson was appointed. Camille, after being appointed as conservator of Mrs. Cook, filed a petition that would allow her mother to be moved to Virginia where Camille resides. The chancellor denied the request. Camille Robinson has resigned as conservator because remaining in Mississippi to care for her mother was too burdensome. Camille brought suit against John concerning the gifts of cash and property. The chancellor upheld the gifts, and Camille appeals. |
| Summary of Opinion Analysis: | Issue 1: Mental capacity Mississippi law requires that the party seeking to set aside a deed prove that the grantor lacked mental capacity at the time of execution. This evidence of mental incapacity must be clear and convincing and not simply that the grantor was suffering from general weakness. The attorney who prepared a deed, power of attorney, durable power of attorney for health care, and a living will, all in favor of John, testified about his meetings with Mrs. Cook over a three-day period and concluded that she had been competent to execute the documents at that time. There is no basis to disturb the chancellor’s conclusion that clear and convincing evidence of a lack of mental capacity had not been shown. Issue 2: Undue influence After finding that there was a presumption of undue influence due to the confidential relationship between Mrs. Cook and John, the chancellor correctly held that the beneficiary could rebut this presumption by clear and convincing evidence. Factors necessary for consideration include the good faith of the beneficiary, the grantor’s full knowledge and deliberation of the consequences of her actions, and evidence of independent consent and action by the grantor. John Cook had a history of complying with the requests of his mother. Upon her request, he had voluntarily conveyed back to his mother a portion of the land she had previously conveyed to him. The attorney’s testimony supports that Mrs. Cook initiated the execution of the deed and other documents. Mrs. Cook communicated on more than one occasion that she wanted to execute these documents in favor of her son due to his taking care of her for many years. Mrs. Cook told Vance about all three of her children and particularly the nature of the relationship she had with each of them. Mrs. Cook knew that John would benefit from this legal action and that he would own all of the property. The attorney verified that Mrs. Cook wanted to give complete control of her assets to John by revoking Camille’s power of attorney and giving John a power of attorney, a durable power of attorney for health care, a living will, and a deed to the entire property. The attorney testified that he took precautions to ensure John Cook was not near his mother when discussions were taking place about what legal action Mrs. Cook wanted the attorney to accomplish on her behalf. He questioned Mrs. Cook extensively about what she wanted to do, why she wanted to do it, and if John Cook had influenced her in anyway in making these decisions. Thus, there was substantial evidence to support the court’s findings. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court
