Weaver v. Parks


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2005-CA-00932-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 12-12-2006
Opinion Author: Barnes, J.
Holding: APPEAL DISMISSED SUA SPONTE

Additional Case Information: Topic: Child custody - Criminal contempt - Fugitive dismissal rule
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Southwick, Irving, Chandler, Griffis, Ishee and Roberts, JJ.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - CUSTODY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 04-18-2005
Appealed from: Hinds County Chancery Court
Judge: William Singletary
Disposition: TEMPORARY CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD AWARDED TO MATERNAL GRANDMOTHER; WEAVER FOUND IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT
Case Number: G2004-532 S/2

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Maurice Weaver




LISA MISHUNE ROSS



 

Appellee: Debra Parks LOUIS JOSEPH GUICHET  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Child custody - Criminal contempt - Fugitive dismissal rule

Summary of the Facts: Maurice Weaver was found to be in constructive criminal contempt of court for absconding with his minor child in violation of an agreed order and for his refusal to return and submit to the jurisdiction of the Chancery Court of Hinds County. Unaware of her client’s whereabouts, Weaver’s counsel perfected his appeal.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: It is well settled that an appellate court may dismiss the appeal of a defendant who is a fugitive from justice during the pendency of his appeal. The fugitive dismissal rule, or fugitive disentitlement doctrine, operates to limit a litigant’s access to the judicial system whose authority he evades. Conduct which jeopardizes the health, safety, and welfare of a child is certainly worthy of deterrence. Weaver has unmistakably ignored the orders of the chancellor in the proceedings below and even acknowledged this fact in his response to one of the contempt petitions. Weaver remains at large with his child, their whereabouts and the child’s health status unknown. Allowing Weaver to employ the Court’s resources only if the outcome is favorable to him would be an affront to the dignity of the Court and would only encourage such behavior in the future. Accordingly, Weaver’s appeal is dismissed sua sponte.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court