Jones v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2009-CP-01943-COA
Linked Case(s): 2009-CP-01943-COA ; 2009-CT-01943-SCT

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 11-02-2010
Opinion Author: Ishee, J.
Holding: Affirmed.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Irving, Griffis, Barnes and Maxwell, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Carlton, J.
Concurs in Result Only: Roberts, J.
Procedural History: PCR
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 11-16-2009
Appealed from: WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: W. Ashley Hines
Disposition: MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED
Case Number: CI2009-0145

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Holley Jones




PRO SE



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: W. GLENN WATTS  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Post-conviction relief - Illegal sentence

    Summary of the Facts: Holley Jones pled guilty to armed robbery. Jones was sentenced to ten years. His sentence was suspended, and he was placed on five years of probation under the provisions of the Regimented Inmate Discipline program. An amended sentencing order was later entered simultaneously with another order removing Jones from the RID program. The amended order further placed Jones on supervised probation for five years or until the trial court altered, terminated, or directed the execution of the sentence. Five years later, Jones was charged with the felony of selling cocaine. He was revoked from probation for failure to report, failure to pay court assessments, and committing the felony of selling cocaine. Thereafter, he filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief which was denied. He appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Jones argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his PCR motion because his probation was revoked after its expiration and that his present sentence imposed by the trial court is illegal. Jones's basis for claiming that he is serving an illegal sentence is his contention that he had completed his five-year probation when it was alleged he failed to meet his probation requirements. The record shows that Jones was placed on five-year probation on April 5, 2001; hence, his probation would have expired on April 5, 2006. The date of Jones’s charge for the sale of cocaine was February 16, 2006. Therefore, he was within his five-year probation at the time in question, and this issue is without merit.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court