Easley v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2009-KA-00668-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 10-28-2010
Opinion Author: Lamar, J.
Holding: Affirmed.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Statutory rape & Fondling - Lindsey brief
Judge(s) Concurring: Waller, C.J., Carlson and Graves, P.JJ., Dickinson, Randolph, Kitchens, Chandler and Pierce, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 03-20-2009
Appealed from: LEFLORE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: W. Ashley Hines
Disposition: Count I: Conviction of statutory rape and sentence of life imprisonment in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections; Count II: Conviction of statutory rape and sentence of thirty (30) years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections; Count III: Conviction of fondling and sentence of fifteen (15) years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections; Count IV: Conviction of fondling and sentence of fifteen (15) years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. Sentences in Counts I, ll, lll and IV shall run consecutively.
District Attorney: WILLIE DWAYNE RICHARDSON
Case Number: 2008-0235

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Michael Easley




W. S. STUCKEY, JR.



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: LAURA H. TEDDER  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Statutory rape & Fondling - Lindsey brief

Summary of the Facts: Michael Easley convicted of two counts of statutory rape and two counts of fondling. Finding no arguable issue to raise on appeal, Easley’s attorney filed a brief in compliance with Lindsey v. State, 939 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2005).

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Easley’s appellate counsel complied with the procedure set forth in Lindsey v. State. Easley failed to file a pro se brief. A review of the record shows no arguable issue warranting supplemental briefing. And there is no reversible error.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court