Butler v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2009-KA-01219-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 08-17-2010
Opinion Author: Griffis, J.
Holding: Affirmed.

Additional Case Information: Topic: Robbery - Excessive sentence
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Irving, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, Carlton and Maxwell, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 06-24-2009
Appealed from: TUNICA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: Al Smith
Disposition: CONVICTED OF COUNT I, ROBBERY, AND SENTENCED TO FIFTEEN YEARS AND COUNT II, CONSPIRACY, AND SENTENCED TO FIVE YEARS, WITH THE SENTENCES TO RUN CONCURRENTLY, ALL IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
District Attorney: Brenda Fay Mitchell
Case Number: 2008-0010

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: Travis Butler




ROBERT A. CHAMOUN



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: BILLY L. GORE  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Robbery - Excessive sentence

    Summary of the Facts: Travis Butler was convicted of robbery and was sentenced to fifteen years. He appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Butler argues that the circuit court abused its discretion when it sentenced him to fifteen years – the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the crime of robbery – because the court failed to consider Butler’s young age of nineteen at the time of sentencing, his status as a first-time offender with no prior criminal record, and the remorse he demonstrated during his testimony at trial. It is well settled that sentencing is within the sole discretion of the circuit court. Here, the circuit court sentenced Butler to fifteen years, a term within the limits of the statute. Thus, the court did not abuse its discretion. Furthermore, the circuit judge was largely unlimited as to the kind of information he may consider during sentencing. Butler also argues that the mitigating factors in the record support an inference of gross disproportionality. However, the record does not support an inference of gross disproportionality. The circuit judge considered that this was an act of violence against another person and sentenced Butler to a sentence within the limits set forth by the Legislature.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court