Miss. Transp. Comm'n v. Eng'g Assocs.


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-CT-01780-SCT
Linked Case(s): 2007-SA-01780-SCT ; 2007-SA-01780-COA ; 2007-SA-01780-COA ; 2007-CT-01780-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 06-10-2010
Opinion Author: Lamar, J.
Holding: Reversed and rendered

Additional Case Information: Topic: Administrative law - Jurisdiction - Miss. Const. art. 6, § 156 - Section 11-51-75 - Section 11-51-95
Judge(s) Concurring: Waller, C.J., Carlson and Graves, P.JJ., Dickinson, Randolph, Kitchens, Chandler and Pierce, JJ.
Procedural History: Admin or Agency Judgment
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - STATE BOARDS AND AGENCIES
Writ of Certiorari: yes
Appealed from Court of Appeals

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 07-27-2007
Appealed from: Hinds County Circuit Court
Judge: W. Swan Yerger
Disposition: The Mississippi Transportation Commission rescinded a memorandum of understanding between Engineering Associates, Inc., and the City of Meridian. EAI appealed that decision to the circuit court, which found MTC’s decision to be arbitrary and capricious. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision.
Case Number: 251-05-232CN

Note: This judgment reverses and remands a previous judgment by the Court of Appeals. See the original COA opinion at: http://www.mssc.state.ms.us/Images/Opinions/CO55974.pdf

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION




JAMES H. ISONHOOD, LAWRENCE ARTHUR SCHEMMEL



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, A DIVISION OF PICKERING FIRM, INC. MARK D. HERBERT, KEVIN ALAN CROFT  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Administrative law - Jurisdiction - Miss. Const. art. 6, § 156 - Section 11-51-75 - Section 11-51-95

    Summary of the Facts: The Mississippi Transportation Commission rescinded a memorandum of understanding between Engineering Associates, Inc., and the City of Meridian. EAI appealed that decision to the circuit court, which found MTC’s decision to be arbitrary and capricious. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Pursuant to Miss. Const. art. 6, § 156, the circuit court shall have jurisdiction in all matters civil and criminal in this state not vested by this Constitution in some other court, and such appellate jurisdiction as shall be prescribed by law. The circuit court has no authority to judicially create a right of appeal from an administrative agency in the absence of clear statutory authority therefore. Thus, in this case, the appellate jurisdiction of the circuit court is limited to that prescribed by law. Neither section 11-51-75 nor section 11-51-95 can be used by EAI to seek appellate review of this administrative decision by MTC. EAI argues that the circuit court acquired jurisdiction of this action under URCCC 5.03. However, this rule does not confer jurisdiction over appeals but rather provides for the standard of review. Without a statutory right of appeal, any review of MTC’s decision could be sought only through an independent action. The circuit court thus lacked jurisdiction over EAI’s appeal.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court