Chatman v. State
| Docket Number: | 2009-KA-00050-COA | |
| Court of Appeals: |
Opinion Link Opinion Date: 02-23-2010 Opinion Author: Carlton, J Holding: Affirmed |
|
| Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Aggravated assault & Burglary of dwelling - Lindsey brief Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Griffis, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts and Maxwell, JJ. Concurs in Result Only: Irving, J. Procedural History: Jury Trial Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY |
|
| Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 12-15-2008 Appealed from: WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT Judge: W. Ashley Hines Disposition: CONVICTED OF COUNT I, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, AND SENTENCED TO TWENTY YEARS, WITH FIVE YEARS SUSPENDED AND FIVE YEARS OF SUPERVISED PROBATION, AND COUNT II, BURGLARY OF A DWELLING, AND SENTENCED TO TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, WITH TEN YEARS SUSPENDED AND FIVE YEARS OF SUPERVISED PROBATION, TO RUN CONSECUTIVELY IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS District Attorney: Willie Dewayne Richardson Case Number: 2008-0106 |
|
| Party Name: | Attorney Name: | Brief(s) Available: | ||
| Appellant: | DERRICK CHATMAN |
PRO SE, LESLIE S. LEE, CLAYTON MATTHEW CUMMINGS, W. DANIEL HINCHCLIFF |
|
|
| Appellee: | STATE OF MISSISSIPPI | OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: CHARLES W. MARIS, JR. | ||
Synopsis provided by:  If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
|
| Topic: | Aggravated assault & Burglary of dwelling - Lindsey brief |
| Summary of the Facts: | Derrick Chatman was convicted of aggravated assault and burglary of a dwelling. He was sentenced to twenty years on the aggravated assault charge, with five years suspended, and twenty-five years for the burglary of a dwelling charge, with ten years suspended. He appeals. |
| Summary of Opinion Analysis: | Chatman’s counsel filed a Lindsey brief stating that he examined the entire record and found no arguable issues for appeal. An examination of Chatman’s pro se supplemental brief and a review of the record shows that Chatman raises no arguable issues in support of his appeal which merit discussion on review. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court
