Doe v. Salvation Army
Docket Number: | 2001-CA-01599-SCT | |
Supreme Court: | Opinion Link Opinion Date: 01-23-2003 Opinion Author: Easley, J. Holding: Affirmed |
|
Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Action for damages - Punitive damages Judge(s) Concurring: Pittman, C.J., Smith, P.J., Waller, Cobb and Carlson, JJ. Dissenting Author : McRAE, P.J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION. Concur in Part, Dissent in Part 1: McRae, P.J., Concurs in Part and Dissents in Part Without Separate Written Opinion Concurs in Result Only: Diaz and Graves, JJ. Procedural History: Jury Trial Nature of the Case: CIVIL - TORTS-OTHER THAN PERSONAL INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE |
|
Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 06-29-2001 Appealed from: Holmes County Circuit Court Judge: Jannie M. Lewis Disposition: The trial court denied a motion for new trial on the issue of punitive damages. Case Number: 98-0525 |
|
Note: | PITTMAN, C.J., SMITH, P.J., WALLER, COBB AND CARLSON, JJ., CONCUR. DIAZ AND GRAVES, JJ., CONCUR IN RESULT ONLY. McRAE, P.J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION. |
Party Name: | Attorney Name: | |||
Appellant: | Jane Doe, as Mother and Next Friend of John Doe, a Minor |
BETH BURTON
EDWARD BLACKMON
CHRISTOPHER BRANDON GLASS
JERRY L. BEASLEY |
||
Appellee: | The Salvation Army | ROBERT L. GIBBS TESELYN AFRIQUE MELTON AMY MANDERSON KLOTZ |
|
Synopsis provided by: If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
Topic: | Action for damages - Punitive damages |
Summary of the Facts: | Doe, mother and next of friend of John Doe, a minor, filed an action for damages against Gregory Peters, Chris Flanagan, and The Salvation Army, alleging sexual assaults by Peters against four minor boys while the boys were attending summer camp at a Salvation Army facility. A jury awarded the four minor Does $30,000 each for a total of $120,000 in compensatory damages and attributed 5% fault to Peters, 10% to Flanagan and 85% to The Salvation Army. The court declined to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury. The Does appeal. |
Summary of Opinion Analysis: | The Does argue that the court erred in failing to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury, because punitive damages are recoverable in situations involving proven assault and intentional acts have been committed by an employer’s agent. A plaintiff can recover punitive damages only if there is a demonstrated willful or malicious wrong or if there is gross, reckless disregard for the rights of others. Liability for compensatory damages does not signify that punitive damages must be assessed against an employer. When looking at the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable, hypothetical trier of fact could not find either malice or gross neglect or reckless disregard by The Salvation Army. Peters was clearly not acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the assault. Therefore, the court did not err in declining to submit the issue to the jury. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court