Prather v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-CP-01452-COA
Linked Case(s): 2007-CP-01452-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 10-14-2008
Opinion Author: CHANDLER, J.
Holding: DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Timeliness of appeal - M.R.A.P. 4(a) - M.R.A.P. 2(a)(1) - M.R.A.P. 26(a)
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Irving, Griffis, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, and Carltong, JJ.
Procedural History: PCR
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-17-2007
Appealed from: TIPPAH COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: Andrew K. Howorth
Disposition: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED
Case Number: T06-244

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: HERMAN PRATHER




HERMAN PRATHER (PRO SE)



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JOHN R. HENRY  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Post-conviction relief - Timeliness of appeal - M.R.A.P. 4(a) - M.R.A.P. 2(a)(1) - M.R.A.P. 26(a)

    Summary of the Facts: Herman Prather pled guilty to sexual battery. He filed a motion for post-conviction relief which was denied on January 19, 2007. Prather then filed his notice of appeal on August 14, 2007.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: M.R.A.P. 4(a) requires that a notice of appeal be filed within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment. Under M.R.A.P. 2(a)(1), an appeal which violates the thirty-day requirement shall be dismissed. Under M.R.A.P. 26(a), Prather had until Tuesday, February 20, 2007, to timely file his appeal. Prather has shown no good reason as to why his notice of appeal was not filed until August 2007, over five months after his thirty-day deadline for filing a notice of appeal had expired. Thus, his appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court