Thompson v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-KA-01338-COA
Linked Case(s): 2007-KA-01338-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 09-02-2008
Opinion Author: Irving, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Burglary of building - Ineffective assistance of counsel - Sufficiency of evidence
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Lee and Myers, P.JJ., Chandler, Griffis, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, and Carlton, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 06-04-2007
Appealed from: Claiborne County Circuit Court
Judge: Lamar Pickard
Disposition: CONVICTED OF BURGLARY OF A BUILDING AND SENTENCED TO SIX YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
District Attorney: Alexander C. Martin
Case Number: CR-2007-10-A

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: NATHANIEL THOMPSON




BENJAMIN A. SUBER



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief

  • Appellee: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. GLENN WATTS  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Burglary of building - Ineffective assistance of counsel - Sufficiency of evidence

    Summary of the Facts: Nathaniel Thompson was convicted of burglary of a building and sentenced to six years. He appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Ineffective assistance of counsel Thompson argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request an instruction telling the jury to regard Craft’s testimony as an accomplice with heightened scrutiny. The record before the Court is not ripe for review of this contention. Although Thompson indicated in his brief that he would stipulate to the adequacy of the record, no such stipulation has been offered by the State. Issue 2: Sufficiency of evidence Although Thompson and others testified on his behalf, the jury was entitled to believe whomever’s story it found most credible. The testimony of Thompson’s accomplice and the corroboration provided by other State witnesses supplied sufficient evidence for a conviction.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court