Williams v. Jackson


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-CA-00517-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 08-12-2008
Opinion Author: Myers, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Personal injury - Duty to warn
Judge(s) Concurring: KIing C.J., Lee, P.J., Irving, Chandler, Griffis, Barnes, Ishee, Roberts, and Carlton, JJ.
Procedural History: Summary Judgment
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - PERSONAL INJURY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 03-21-2007
Appealed from: SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: Vernon Cotten
Disposition: SUMMARY JUDGMENT ENTERED IN FAVOR OF WAL-MART
Case Number: 2005-CV-224-SC-C

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: KEITH WILLIAMS




JOSEPH E. ROBERTS, GRADY L. MCCOOL



 
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: HOWARD JACKSON, WAL-MART PROPERTIES, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC., AND WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. PHILIP A. GUNN, RUSSELL LATINO  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Personal injury - Duty to warn

    Summary of the Facts: Keith Williams brought suit against Howard Jackson, Wal-Mart Properties, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. Williams was involved in an altercation on Wal-Mart’s premises with Jackson. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Wal-Mart, and Williams appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Williams argues that Wal-Mart breached its duty to protect him from an attack by Jackson, and that breach was the proximate cause of Williams’s injuries. The highest standard of care that would be owed to anyone who comes onto someone else’s land in Mississippi is to keep the premises reasonably safe and when not reasonably safe to warn only where there is hidden danger or peril that is not plain and in open view. Generally, the duty to warn disappears entirely when it is shown that the injured person did, in fact, observe and fully appreciate the peril. The proximate cause of Williams’s injuries was the interjection of himself into the argument between Jackson and Williams’s family in front of Wal-Mart. The injuries sustained by Williams were both caused by his own actions and further unforeseeable by Wal-Mart.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court