Willis v. State
Docket Number: | 2007-KA-01405-COA Linked Case(s): 2007-KA-01405-COA |
|
Court of Appeals: |
Opinion Link Opinion Date: 07-22-2008 Opinion Author: MYERS, P.J. Holding: Affirmed |
|
Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Robbery - Peremptory challenges - Use of defendant’s nickname Judge(s) Concurring: LEE, P.J., CHANDLER, GRIFFIS, BARNES, ISHEE AND CARLTON, JJ. Concur in Part, Concur in Result 1: Roberts, J. Concurs in Result Only: King, C.J., and Irving, J. Procedural History: Jury Trial Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY |
|
Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 07-25-2006 Appealed from: Forrest County Circuit Court Judge: Robert Helfrich Disposition: CONVICTED OF ROBBERY AND SENTENCED AS A HABITUAL OFFENDER TO FIFTEEN YEARS IN THE CUSTODY OF MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OR POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE OR EARLY RELEASE, SAID SENTENCE TO RUN CONSECUTIVE TO ANY OTHER SENTENCE IMPOSED BY ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. District Attorney: Jon Mark Weathers Case Number: 05-720-CR |
Party Name: | Attorney Name: | |||
Appellant: | RAYMOND MAURICE WILLIS, JR. |
W. DANIEL HINCHCLIFF |
||
Appellee: | STATE OF MISSISSIPPI | OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JOHN R. HENRY |
|
Synopsis provided by: If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
Topic: | Robbery - Peremptory challenges - Use of defendant’s nickname |
Summary of the Facts: | Raymond Willis, Jr., was convicted of robbery and sentenced as a habitual offender to fifteen years. He appeals. |
Summary of Opinion Analysis: | Issue 1: Peremptory challenges Willis argues that the trial court erred in failing to find that a prima facie case of racial discrimination was made based on the State’s exercising four of the five peremptory challenges against African American jurors. The record is devoid of any indication of the final racial composition of the jury as selected or tendered. The mere fact that four of the five stricken jurors were African Americans does not, in and of itself, create a prima facie case. Issue 2: Use of defendant’s nickname Willis argues that the prosecutor’s questioning of a witness regarding the defendant’s “street name” was an attempt to associate Willis with a street gang. The prosecutor’s questioning did not involve elicitation of gang affiliation. Thus, Willis’s substantive rights were not violated. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court