Acy v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n.


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2005-CC-02019-COA
Linked Case(s): 2005-CC-02019-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 07-17-2007
Opinion Author: IRVING, J.
Holding: REVERSED AND REMANDED: 02/06/2007; MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: 02/20/2007 - DENIED - REVERSED AND REMANDED - 07/17/2007

Additional Case Information: Topic: Unemployment benefits - Misconduct
Judge(s) Concurring: LEE, P.J., CHANDLER AND ISHEE, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): KING, C.J., BARNES AND CARLTON, JJ.
Dissenting Author : GRIFFIS, J.
Dissent Joined By : MYERS, P.J., AND ROBERTS, J.
Procedural History: Admin or Agency Judgment; Motion for Rehearing
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - STATE BOARDS AND AGENCIES; Motion for Rehearing

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 09-16-2005
Appealed from: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Judge: William E. Chapman, III
Disposition: DECISION OF THE BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, FINDING THAT APPELLANT WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, WAS AFFIRMED
Case Number: 2005-125-C
  Consolidated: Consolidated with 2005-CC-02378-COA Mississippi Department of Employment Security v. Kathi L. Acy; Rankin Circuit Court; LC Case #: 2005-0173-C; Ruling Date: 11/01/2005; Ruling Judge: William Chapman, III

Note: This is a modified opinion on a motion for rehearing.

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: KATHI L. ACY




DOUGLAS E. LEVANWAY



 

Appellee: MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION ALBERT B. WHITE  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Unemployment benefits - Misconduct

Summary of the Facts: The opinion for rehearing is denied, and this opinion is substituted for the original opinion. The Board of Review of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security held that Kathi Acy, a former Wal-Mart employee, committed disqualifying misconduct and is therefore not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Acy appeals. The Mississippi Department of Employment Security also appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Misconduct is conduct evincing such willful and wanton disregard of the employer’s interest as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect from his employee. Acy argues that one incident of cursing under her breath in the presence of a customer does not rise to the level of disqualifying misconduct. Acy also argues that Wal-Mart failed to prove that she had been informed that she could be terminated for one instance of being rude to a customer or for using profanity. Accepting that Acy’s conduct was a violation of Wal-Mart’s policies and procedures, thus justifying her termination, her actions do not amount to disqualifying misconduct, as an isolated incident of misconduct by an employee does not generally disqualify the employee from receiving the benefit of unemployment compensation.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court