McWilliams v. McWilliams


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2007-CA-00170-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 11-20-2007
Opinion Author: MYERS, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Real property - Statute of limitations - Section 15-1-49 - Section 15-1-7 - Concealed fraud
Judge(s) Concurring: KING, C.J., LEE, P.J., IRVING, CHANDLER, GRIFFIS, BARNES, ISHEE, ROBERTS AND CARLTON, JJ.,
Procedural History: Summary Judgment
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - REAL PROPERTY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 11-22-2006
Appealed from: SUNFLOWER COUNTY CHANCERY COURT
Judge: Percy L. Lynchard, Jr.
Disposition: Motion for Summary Judgment granted
Case Number: 2005-0302

  Party Name: Attorney Name:   Brief(s) Available:
Appellant: FRANK MCWILLIAMS




MICHAEL L. KNAPP



 
  • Appellant #1 Brief
  • Appellant #1 Reply Brief

  • Appellee: JOHN H. MCWILLIAMS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE D. RIALS MCWILLIAMS TRUST, AND INDIVIDUALLY; AND, D. RIALS MCWILLIAMS, A MINOR LINDSEY C. MEADOR  

    Synopsis provided by:

    If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
    hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

    Topic: Real property - Statute of limitations - Section 15-1-49 - Section 15-1-7 - Concealed fraud

    Summary of the Facts: Frank McWilliams filed a motion to set aside a warranty deed transfer and a trust. Frank’s brother, John McWilliams, who is the trustee of the D. Rials McWilliams Trust, was awarded summary judgment. Frank appeals.

    Summary of Opinion Analysis: Frank argues that the court erred in holding that his complaint alleging a fraudulent conveyance was time-barred pursuant to the three-year statute of limitations found in section 15-1-49. He asserts that his claim to set aside the warranty deed and trust should have been afforded the ten-year statute of limitations, found in section 15-1-7, because this statute speaks directly to the recovery of real property. When a complaint is brought to set aside a land transfer based upon an alleged fraudulent conveyance, the three-year state of limitations, found in section 15-1-49, begins running once the complainant either discovers, or should have discovered with due diligence, the property transfer. Therefore, Frank’s complaint, predicated upon fraud, was to be filed within three years of the transfer, or of the time he would have discovered the transfer using due diligence. The ten-year statute of limitations set out in section 15-1-7 cannot be applied to Frank’s suit, as this statute only governs actions to recover land and presupposes the complainant is asserting a possessory interest in the land in question. Frank alternatively argues that his complaint to set aside the warranty deed and trust is not time-barred due to the tolling of the statute of limitations under the doctrine of concealed fraud. Where an alleged fraudulent conveyance of real property is recorded and available to the public, there can be no concealed fraud preventing the running of statute of limitations. Frank cannot claim that concealed fraud tolled the applicable statute of limitations because the warranty deed transfer and irrevocable trust were filed as public records in the office of the clerk of Sunflower County.


    Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court