Jackson v. Gray, et al.
| Docket Number: | 2005-CP-00861-COA | |
| Court of Appeals: |
Opinion Link Opinion Date: 10-24-2006 Opinion Author: MYERS, P.J. Holding: Affirmed |
|
| Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Post-conviction relief - Sufficiency of evidence Judge(s) Concurring: KING, C.J., LEE, P.J., SOUTHWICK, IRVING, CHANDLER, GRIFFIS, BARNES, ISHEE, AND ROBERTS, JJ. Procedural History: Admin or Agency Judgment Nature of the Case: CIVIL - STATE BOARDS AND AGENCIES |
|
| Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 03-16-2005 Appealed from: Greene County Circuit Court Judge: Robert P. Krebs Disposition: DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROGRAM IS AFFIRMED. Case Number: 2005-03-024(1) |
|
| Party Name: | Attorney Name: | |||
| Appellant: | MARK A. JACKSON A/K/A MARK ANTHONY
JACKSON |
MARK A. JACKSON (PRO SE) |
||
| Appellee: | LT. DEBORAH GRAY, SUPERINTENDENT RONALD KING AND COMMISSIONER CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS | JANE L. MAPP |
|
|
Synopsis provided by:  If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
|
| Topic: | Post-conviction relief - Sufficiency of evidence |
| Summary of the Facts: | Mark Jackson, a Mississippi Department of Corrections inmate, filed suit alleging that prison officials erred in finding him guilty of a Rule Violation Report for engaging in a sexual act with others or indecent exposure, and reclassifying Jackson as a sexual predator within the prison classification system. After exhausting appellate procedures afforded to prisoners under the Administrative Remedy Program, Jackson filed a petition to show cause in the circuit court. The court affirmed the decision of the ARP and dismissed Jackson’s petition. Jackson appeals. |
| Summary of Opinion Analysis: | Jackson failed to include a copy of the issued RVR containing the facts that he asserts as error. Without a copy of the actual RVR including the board’s findings, the lower court and the appellate court are presented with insufficient evidence to overturn the board’s finding of guilt. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court
