Bedford Care Ctr. V. Kirk


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2005-CC-00654-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 08-08-2006
Opinion Author: BARNES, J.
Holding: Reversed and Rendered

Additional Case Information: Topic: Unemployment benefits - Substantial evidence
Judge(s) Concurring: KING, C.J., LEE AND MYERS, P.JJ., SOUTHWICK, IRVING, CHANDLER, GRIFFIS, ISHEE AND ROBERTS, JJ.
Procedural History: Admin or Agency Judgment
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - STATE BOARDS AND AGENCIES

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 03-14-2005
Appealed from: Forrest County Circuit Court
Judge: Robert Helfrich
Disposition: TRIAL COURT REVERSED COMMISSION FINDING AND AWARDED UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
Case Number: C104-0036

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: BEDFORD CARE CENTER




ROBIN L. ROBERTS



 

Appellee: VICKY L. KIRK VICKY L. KIRK (PRO SE)  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Unemployment benefits - Substantial evidence

Summary of the Facts: Vicky Kirk was a nurse working at Bedford Care Center of Petal. Kirk and another nurse were asked to work on the day shift temporarily while another employee was off work with a heart attack. Kirk refused to work the day shift and had her doctor fax an excuse for modified duty. When informed by her supervisor that modified job duties were not available, Kirk stated that she would return with a doctor’s full release. Although she was given an excused absence to go to her doctor, Kirk never returned with a medical release as she stated she would. After leaving, Kirk never spoke to her supervisors at Bedford, even though numerous calls were made to her to determine her status and asking her to return. Kirk filed for unemployment benefits. The appeals referee disqualified Kirk from receiving unemployment benefits. The Board of Review adopted the findings of fact of the appeals referee. The circuit court reversed the Mississippi Employment Security Commission, finding that the employee had not engaged in misconduct. Bedford Care Center appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: The record and the testimony fully supports the factual determination of the Commission. Even the testimony of Kirk supports the conclusion that she did not return to work and did not provide her employer with the doctor’s excuse that she promised. In all the testimony and evidence before the Commission, there was never any discussion about this being a case of discharge, misconduct or insubordination. Thus, there is no factual basis for the decision of the circuit court. There is no indication that Kirk was asked to leave or that she would not have been welcomed back if she chose to come back. Although the circuit court should not have considered documents which were not before the Commission in making its decision, these documents do not support the decision of the circuit court.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court