Lander v. Singing River Hosp. Sys., et al.


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2004-CA-02345-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 07-18-2006
Opinion Author: LEE, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Medical malpractice - Breach of duty
Judge(s) Concurring: KING, C.J., MYERS, P.J., SOUTHWICK, IRVING, CHANDLER, GRIFFIS, BARNES, ISHEE AND ROBERTS, JJ.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 11-03-2004
Appealed from: Jackson County Circuit Court
Judge: Kathy King Jackson
Disposition: VERDICT FOR APPELLEE
Case Number: CI-2001-00,308

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: GERALD LANDER




SUSANNAH ROSS COOLEY, DAVID A. BOWLING



 

Appellee: SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL SYSTEM; OCEAN SPRINGS HOSPITAL HOWARD LAMOYNE SMITH, BRETT K. WILLIAMS, THOMAS L. MUSSELMAN  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Medical malpractice - Breach of duty

Summary of the Facts: Gerald Lander filed suit against Ocean Springs Hospital and Singing River Hospital System due to injuries sustained while Lander was being treated at Ocean Springs Hospital. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the Hospital, and Lander appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Lander argues that the court erred in finding that Lander failed to prove that the Hospital breached its duty to him. Lander argues that the Hospital was negligent in leaving IV number four in his arm for approximately ninety-six hours, resulting in infection and necessitating surgery. However, there was testimony that nurses must use discretion in deciding whether to remove an IV, as the veins of some patients, such as Lander, were difficult to puncture. Lander also argues that the court erroneously found that IV number one was the source of the infection. However, expert testimony supports the court’s finding that the abscess resulted from IV number one. Lander also argues that, even if IV number one produced the abscess, the court erred in failing to find that the Hospital was negligent in treating the infection. This assertion is simply not supported by the record.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court