McCoy v. Gibson


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2001-CA-01700-COA
Linked Case(s): 2001-CA-01700-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 11-04-2003
Opinion Author: Chandler, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Contract - Material breach - Damages
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving and Myers, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Griffis, J.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - CONTRACT

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 09-28-2001
Appealed from: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY COURT
Judge: Thomas L. Zebert
Disposition: FINAL JUDGMENT FOR GIBSON AND AGAINST MCCOY IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,046.79.
Case Number: 48,020 (Z)

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: JON C. MCCOY D/B/A MCCOY HOMES




PAUL E. ROGERS



 

Appellee: PHIL GIBSON AND PENNY GIBSON SHELDON G. ALSTON  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Contract - Material breach - Damages

Summary of the Facts: Jon C. McCoy d/b/a McCoy Homes entered into a contract with Phil and Penny Gibson to construct a home. When a disagreement arose between the parties over McCoy's job performance, McCoy discontinued his duties, and the Gibsons withheld payment. McCoy filed a statutory notice of construction lien for $18,500 with the chancery clerk of Rankin County. The Gibsons then filed a complaint for breach of contract, and McCoy filed a counterclaim. The court found that McCoy breached the contract and awarded the Gibsons $18,046.79 in damages. McCoy appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Breach McCoy argues that the court erred in finding that he had breached the contract by performing substandard work. Material breach is a failure to perform a substantial part of the contract or one or more of its essential terms or conditions, or if there is such a breach as substantially defeats its purpose. A building official inspected the home and testified to "substandard" construction. Additionally, the evidence included approximately twenty-five photographs of structural work asserted to be defective. Therefore, the finding that McCoy breached his duty to perform the construction in a workmanlike manner is well supported by the evidence. Issue 2: Damages McCoy argues that the court erred in finding that the Gibsons had suffered $18,046.79 in damages. The record contains substantial evidence showing the calculation of damages was not speculative, but based upon testamentary and documentary evidence.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court