Sanders v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2001-KA-00795-SCT

Supreme Court: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 01-16-2003
Opinion Author: Carlson, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Murder & Armed robbery - Invocation of right to counsel
Judge(s) Concurring: Pittman, C.J., McRae and Smith, P.JJ., Waller, Cobb, Diaz and Graves, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Easley, J.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 03-30-2001
Appealed from: Warren County Circuit Court
Judge: Isadore Patrick
Disposition: The Appellant was convicted of murder and armed robbery.
District Attorney: G. Gilmore Martin
Case Number: 00-0116-CR-P

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: James Robert Sanders




EUGENE A. PERRIER



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: CHARLES W. MARIS, JR.  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Murder & Armed robbery - Invocation of right to counsel

Summary of the Facts: James Sanders was convicted of murder and armed robbery. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and life imprisonment without parole for armed robbery. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Sanders argues that he requested legal counsel after being informed of his constitutional rights and that his constitutional rights were violated when the sheriff pursued the interrogation. When a suspect invokes his right to counsel, all interrogation must cease until the lawyer is present unless the suspect himself reinitiates communication with the police. Sanders’ statement indicates that Sanders re-initiated the conversation with the sheriff by discussing his charges and the possible punishment he could receive. The trial court correctly found that Sanders waived his right to counsel by offering to talk to the sheriff after being advised of his constitutional rights.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court