Wilson v. State
Docket Number: | 2011-CP-00315-COA | |
Court of Appeals: |
Opinion Link Opinion Date: 08-28-2012 Opinion Author: Roberts, J. Holding: Affirmed |
|
Additional Case Information: |
Topic: Post-conviction relief - Double jeopardy - Section 97-37-1 - Section 97-37-5 - Ineffective assistance of counsel Judge(s) Concurring: Griffis, P.J. and Fair, J. Concur in Part, Concur in Result 1: Irving, P.J. and Maxwell, J., Concur in Part and in the Result Without Separate Written Opinion Concur in Part, Dissent in Part 1: Ishee, J., Concurs in Part and Dissents in Part With Separate Written Opinion, Joined by Lee, C.J., and Russell, J.; Barnes, J., Joins In Part. Concur in Part, Dissent in Part Joined By 1: Ishee, J., Concurs in Part and Dissents in Part With Separate Written Opinion, Joined by Lee, C.J., and Russell, J.; Barnes, J., Joins In Part. Concurs in Result Only: Carlton, J., Concurs in Result Only Without Separate Written Opinion Procedural History: PCR Nature of the Case: PCR |
|
Trial Court: |
Date of Trial Judgment: 12-20-2010 Appealed from: Madison County Circuit Court Judge: Samac Richardson Disposition: MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED Case Number: CI-2010-0452-R |
Party Name: | Attorney Name: | |||
Appellant: | Carlos Wilson |
PRO SE |
||
Appellee: | State of Mississippi | OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL: DEIRDRE MCCRORY JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS |
|
Synopsis provided by: If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office. |
Topic: | Post-conviction relief - Double jeopardy - Section 97-37-1 - Section 97-37-5 - Ineffective assistance of counsel |
Summary of the Facts: | Carlos Wilson pled guilty to the charge in his indictment of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and to a bill of information charging him with carrying a concealed weapon. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to three years for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and five years for CCW. Wilson filed a motion for post-conviction relief which the court denied. He appeals. |
Summary of Opinion Analysis: | Issue 1: Double jeopardy Wilson argues that he could not be convicted of violating both section 97-37-1 (CCW) and section 97-37-5 (felon in possession of a firearm) since the same act of possessing a firearm found under the seat of his vehicle was the basis for both convictions. A criminal defendant may be convicted of more than one offense that arises out of a single event where each offense requires proof of a different element. It is clear from a reading of the statutes under which Wilson was convicted that there is no double-jeopardy violation. The offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon requires proof that the defendant has been previously convicted of a felony, but the offense of CCW does not require the defendant to have a prior felony conviction. Further, the offense of CCW requires that the weapon be “concealed in whole or in part,” and the offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm has no such requirement. Issue 2: Ineffective assistance of counsel Wilson argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not object to the violation of his double-jeopardy protections. Since there was no double-jeopardy violation, Wilson’s attorney could not be ineffective for failing to object to it. |
Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court