Cressionnie v. Sparkman


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-CP-00212-COA
Linked Case(s): 2002-CP-00212-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 01-21-2003
Opinion Author: Chandler, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Post-conviction relief - Timeliness of extradition - 18 U.S.C.A. § 3182
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving and Myers, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Griffis, J.
Procedural History: PCR
Nature of the Case: PCR

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-11-2002
Appealed from: Sunflower County Circuit Court
Judge: Richard Smith
Disposition: HABEAS PETITION DISMISSED; THE DELAY IN THE EXTRADITION TO MISSISSIPPI DID NOT VIOLATE EXTRADITION LAWS.
District Attorney: Frank Carlton
Case Number: 2001-0554

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Clinton L. Cressionnie a/k/a Tony Roberts




PRO SE



 

Appellee: Emmitt L. Sparkman OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JANE L. MAPP  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Post-conviction relief - Timeliness of extradition - 18 U.S.C.A. § 3182

Summary of the Facts: After completing a Florida sentence, Clinton Cressionnie was extradited to Mississippi where he was convicted of three pending charges. He appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and sentence. Cressionnie filed an application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: 18 U.S.C.A. § 3182 provides that whenever the executive authority of a state demands a person as a fugitive from justice and produces a copy of an indictment or an affidavit charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime, the executive authority of the state to which such person has fled shall cause him to be arrested and delivered to the agent of such authority appointed to receive the fugitive when he shall appear. The prisoner may be discharged if the agent fails to appear within thirty days from the time of the arrest. Cressionnie argues that the statute required that Mississippi produce its agent within thirty days from the date of his arrest in Florida. However, the statute applies when the sole basis for the asylum state's detention of a fugitive is the demanding state's extradition request. Cressionnie's detention was based on crimes he had committed in Florida as well as on Mississippi's extradition request. An asylum state may postpone extradition until the resolution of criminal charges incurred by the fugitive during his refuge in the asylum state. Here, Florida and Mississippi elected to allow Cressionnie to complete his Florida sentence before extradition for trial in Mississippi. At completion of the Florida sentence, Mississippi had thirty days in which to present its agent for extradition. Extradition occurred the day that Cressionnie completed the Florida sentence


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court