Seeley v. Stafford


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-CA-00126-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 03-04-2003
Opinion Author: Griffis, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Modification of child support - Property settlement agreement - Statutory guidelines - Section 43-19-101(1)
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King and Southwick, P.JJ., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers and Chandler, JJ.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 10-11-2001
Appealed from: DeSoto County Chancery Court
Judge: Melvin McClure, Jr.
Disposition: PETITION FOR MODIFICATION DENIED; APPELLANT FOUND IN CONTEMPT.
Case Number: 94-10-1184

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Jeffrey Lee Seeley




DAVID CLAY VANDERBURG



 

Appellee: Ginger Seeley Stafford KENNETH E. STOCKTON  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Modification of child support - Property settlement agreement - Statutory guidelines - Section 43-19-101(1)

Summary of the Facts: Jeffrey Seeley and Ginger Seeley Stafford obtained an irreconcilable differences divorce. Their property settlement agreement provided that Stafford would have custody of their three children and that Seeley would pay $602 per month in child support. Seeley filed a petition for modification seeking to reduce his monthly child support obligation, and Stafford answered and filed a counterclaim. The court denied the modification, ruled that Seeley was in willful contempt and entered a judgment against Seeley for past due child support in the sum of $36,542.47, together with interest. Seeley appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Seeley argues that the court erred by failing to follow the child support guidelines. Under section 43-19-101(1), child support for three children is 22% of adjusted gross income. An irreconcilable differences divorce may be granted if the parties provide by written agreement for the custody and maintenance of any children and for the settlement of any property rights between the parties. Seeley voluntarily agreed to pay monthly child support of $602. Such an agreement, voluntarily entered by the parties and approved by the court, is enforceable as though entered by the court following contested proceedings. Because Seeley did not challenge the initial decree on the basis of fraud or overreaching, it must be enforced subject to subsequent modification. A modification can only occur if there has been a material or substantial change in circumstances of one or more of the parties. Seeley voluntarily left his job following the divorce. An obligor who, acting in bad faith, voluntarily worsens his financial position so that he cannot meet his obligations cannot obtain a modification of support. Therefore, there was no material or substantial change in circumstances to justify a reduction in Seeley’s child support obligation.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court