Crawford v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2001-KA-01345-COA
Linked Case(s): 2001-CT-01345-COA ; 2001-CT-01345-SCT

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 03-11-2003
Opinion Author: Southwick, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Burglary - Sufficiency of evidence - Ineffective assistance of counsel
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King, P.J., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers, Chandler and Griffis, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 04-24-2001
Appealed from: Harrison County Circuit Court
Judge: Jerry O. Terry, Sr.
Disposition: CONVICTION OF BURGLARY OF A DWELLING; SENTENCED TO SERVE TWENTYFIVE YEARS WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE
District Attorney: Cono A. Caranna, II
Case Number: B-2401-01-007

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Paul Elvis Crawford




LISA D. COLLUMS



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: DEIRDRE MCCRORY  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Burglary - Sufficiency of evidence - Ineffective assistance of counsel

Summary of the Facts: Paul Crawford was convicted of burglary and was sentenced to twenty-five years. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Sufficiency of evidence Crawford argues that the evidence failed to demonstrate any proof of his intentions. An inference of the intent to steal may arise from proof of the breaking and entering. Therefore, the State met its burden of presenting evidence with regard to intent. Crawford also argues that the prosecution's identification testimony and the lack of physical evidence fail the test of sufficiency. However, an eyewitness in the home identified Crawford with certainty, and this was more than sufficient evidence. Issue 2: Ineffective assistance of counsel While Crawford raises the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, that is a matter usually better suited for post-conviction relief because insufficient evidence is in the record of the trial and related matters to evaluate the claim


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court