Stringer v. State


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2002-KA-01892-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 01-06-2004
Opinion Author: Southwick, P.J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Attempted aggravated assault on officer - Opinion testimony - M.R.E. 701 - Sufficiency of evidence
Judge(s) Concurring: McMillin, C.J., King, P.J., Bridges, Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers, Chandler and Griffis, JJ.
Procedural History: Jury Trial
Nature of the Case: CRIMINAL - FELONY

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 11-26-2002
Appealed from: Jones County Circuit Court
Judge: Billy Joe Landrum
Disposition: ATTEMPTED AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - 20 YEARS, 15 YEARS TO SERVE IN FULL AND 5 YEARS SUSPENDED
District Attorney: C. Grant Hedgepeth
Case Number: 2002-5-KR2

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Thurmon Stringer




ANTHONY J. BUCKLEY



 

Appellee: State of Mississippi OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: BILLY L. GORE  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Attempted aggravated assault on officer - Opinion testimony - M.R.E. 701 - Sufficiency of evidence

Summary of the Facts: Thurmon Stringer was convicted of attempted aggravated assault on a police officer. He appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: Issue 1: Exclusion of testimony Stringer argues that a portion of an officer's testimony should have been excluded, because he improperly testified as to what Stringer's intent was when he fired his weapon. Pursuant to M.R.E. 701, statements of opinion which are rationally based on the perception of the witness and are helpful to the clear understanding of the testimony or the determination of a fact in issue are admissible. The statements that the officer made at trial were rationally based on what he had observed. Issue 2: Sufficiency of evidence Stringer argues that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of attempted aggravated assault, because he did not shoot at the officer but shot at the house wall. Three officers present at the scene stated that Stringer pointed the gun at them and refused demands to drop it. There was also testimony from an investigator who concluded that the bullets fired from Stringer's gun were shot in the officer's direction. This was sufficient evidence.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court