Tate v. Tate


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2003-CA-00280-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 06-08-2004
Opinion Author: Chandler, J.
Holding: Reversed and remanded

Additional Case Information: Topic: Divorce - Equitable division of marital property - Ferguson factors
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Bridges, P.J., Thomas, Lee, Irving, Myers and Griffis, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Southwick, P.J.
Procedural History: Bench Trial
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 12-20-2002
Appealed from: Lee County Chancery Court
Judge: John C. Ross, Jr.
Disposition: CHANCELLOR RESOLVED ISSUES REGARDING PROPERTY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
Case Number: 99-1292

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: Eddie Tate




GARY L. CARNATHAN



 

Appellee: Carolyn Tate BEN LOGAN  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Divorce - Equitable division of marital property - Ferguson factors

Summary of the Facts: The Lee County Chancery Court issued a judgment for divorce that incorporated a settlement agreement in which Eddie and Carolyn Tate agreed to divide all marital assets except for the couple's residence. The court later found that Carolyn should take 100% of the home's value, and Eddie appeals.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: The Ferguson factors are eight considerations that the Mississippi Supreme Court adopted for chancery courts to use when they equitably divide marital property. While the chancery court in this case correctly identified the Ferguson factors as being the applicable legal standard, its finding that all of the contributions Eddie made to the household went to every day living expenses, and none of the contributions went to debt service on the home's mortgage is not supported by the record. Additionally, the record is silent as to what contributions to the debt service on the home were made during the nearly two years from the taking of evidence to the entry of the decree, and during the sixteen months from the entry of the decree to the present. On remand, the court should apply the Ferguson factors not only to the facts adduced at the hearing but also give consideration to any additional facts not shown in the record.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court