J.C., et al. v. W.F.S., et al.


<- Return to Search Results


Docket Number: 2003-CP-00242-COA
Linked Case(s): 2003-CP-00242-COA

Court of Appeals: Opinion Link
Opinion Date: 07-20-2004
Opinion Author: Griffis, J.
Holding: Affirmed

Additional Case Information: Topic: Termination of parental rights - Right to appeal in forma pauperis
Judge(s) Concurring: King, C.J., Bridges and Southwick, P.JJ., Lee, Irving, Myers and Chandler, JJ.
Non Participating Judge(s): Barnes, J.
Procedural History: Summary Judgment
Nature of the Case: CIVIL - OTHER

Trial Court: Date of Trial Judgment: 01-24-2003
Appealed from: Marshall County Circuit Court
Judge: Gray Evans
Disposition: DENIED MOTION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Case Number: M2002-017

  Party Name: Attorney Name:  
Appellant: J.C. and S.C.




PRO SE



 

Appellee: W.F.S., L.Y. and R.Y. PEGGY A. JONES JOHN G. WHEELER  

Synopsis provided by:

If you are interested in subscribing to the weekly synopses of all Mississippi Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
hand downs please contact Tammy Upton in the MLI Press office.

Topic: Termination of parental rights - Right to appeal in forma pauperis

Summary of the Facts: J.C. and S.C. brought suit, pro se, against attorney William Schneller, L.Y. and R.Y., and attorney Kay Cobb. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Schneller, the Youngs, and Cobb. J.C. and S.C. filed their notice of appeal and subsequently filed a motion to appeal in forma pauperis. The court denied their motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and they appeal.

Summary of Opinion Analysis: There is no right to appeal in forma pauperis in a civil action unless a fundamental right is at issue. Since the circuit court did not decide, and could not have decided, to terminate J.C. and S.C.’s parental rights, their attempt to use the circuit court to resurrect a previously adjudicated matter by attempting to craft a new right of in forma pauperis appeal is without merit.


Home | Terms of Use | About the JDP | Feedback | Using JDP | MC Law Library | Mississippi Supreme Court